Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The main thesis of the presented article implies that a possible and, simultaneously, immensely important response to the question “Why philosophy?” demonstrates the necessity of a philosophical diagnosis regarding the current condition of co-mmunicative rationality. This diagnosis—obtained on the basis of the analyses and decisions of transcendental-pragmatic communication philosophy—ultimately obliges philosophy to construct the theoretical framework for a new paideiaproject. The primary features of this project stem from the recognition of the megamedia character of today’s communication space and fundamental threats that are conditioned by the specificity of this space. The postulated paideia project must be based on the ethical principle of co-responsibility and its goal: the shaping of discursive rationality.
Keywords
Article Details
Copyright (c) 2022 INSTED: Interdisciplinary Studies in Education &Society
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
TCE (INSTED) is an open access journal, which means that access to the full texts is free of charge. People using the journal may download publications, copy and print them, as well as post on their websites links to the full texts of the journal's publications. Texts can be used as long as readers do not exceed the licenses. Authors submitting manuscripts for publication obtain copyrights. Unless otherwise specified, published texts are available under the Creative Commons Attribution - Share Alike 4.0 International license.
References
- Apel, K.-O. (1973). Transformation der Philosophie, v. 1-2. Suhrkamp.
- Apel, K.-O. (1986). Logosauszeichnung der menschlichen Sprache. Die philosophische Tragweite der Sprachtheorie. In H.-G. Bosshard (Ed.), Perspektiven auf Sprache. Interdisziplinäre Beiträge zum Gedenken an Hans Hörmann (pp. 45-87). De Gruyter.
- Apel, K.-O. (1996). Die Vernunftfunktion der kommunikativen Rationalität. Zum Verhältnis von konsensualkommunikativer Rationalität, strategischer Rationalität und Systemrationalität.
- In K.-O. Apel & M. Kettner (Eds.), Die eine Vernunft und die vielen Rationalitäten (pp.17-41) Suhrkamp.
- Apel, K.-O., & Holger, B. (Eds.) (2001). Prinzip Mitverantwortung. Grundlage für Ethik und Pädagogik. Königshausen & Neumann.
- Bernstein, M. S., Monroy-Hernández, A., Drew, H., André, P., Panovich, K., & Vargas, G. (2011). 4chan and /b/: An analysis of anonymity and ephemerality in a large online community. In Proceedings of the Fifth International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media. AAAI Press. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/221297869_4chan_and_b_An_Analysis_of_Anonymity_and_Ephemerality_in_a_Large_Online_Community
- Castells, M. (2001). The internet galaxy: Reflections on the internet, business, and society. Oxford University Press.
- Christopherson, K. (2007). The positive and negative implications of anonymity in Internet social interactions: “On the internet, nobody knows you’re a dog.”. Computers in Human Behavior, 23: 3038–3056. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/222428988_The_positive_and_negative_implications_of_anonymity_in_Internet_social_interactions_On_the_Internet_Nobody_Knows_You%27re_a_Dog
- Heirman, W., & Walrave, M. (2008). Assessing concerns and issues about the mediation of technology in cyberbullying. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, 2(2).
- Jaeger, W. (1986). Paideia: The ideals of Greek culture, Three Volumes. (G. Highed, Trans.). Oxford University Press.
- Joinson, A. (1998). Causes and implications of disinhibited behavior on the Internet. In J. Gackenbach (Ed.), Psychology and the Internet: Intrapersonal, interpersonal, and transpersonal implications (pp. 43–60). Academic Press.
- Kuhlmann, W. 1985. Reflexive Letztbegründung. Untersuchungen zur Transzendentalpragmatik, Freiburg/München: Verlag Karl Alber.
- Lee, E.-J. (2007). Deindividuation effects on group polarization in computer-mediated communication: the role of group identification, public-self-awareness, and perceived argument quality. Journal of Communication, 57(2): 385–403.
- Levinson, P. (2009). New new media. Penguin Academics.
- Martens, E., & Schnädelbach, H. (1985). Philosophie: Ein Grundkurs. Rowohlt Verlag.
- Marrou, H. I. (1982). A history of education in Antiquity. (G. Lamb, Trans.). University of Wisconsin Press.
- Postmes, T. and Spears, R. (1998). Deindividuation and antinormative behavior: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 123: 238–259.
- Pyżalski, J. (2012). From cyberbullying to electronic aggression: Typology of the phenomenon. Emotional and Behavioural Difficulties, 17(3–4), 305–317.
- Searle, J. (1969). Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge University Press.
- Sierocka, B. (2003). Krytyka i dyskurs: O transcendentalno-pragmatycznym uprawomocnieniu krytyki filozoficznej. Aureus.
- Sierocka, B. (2006). Idea współodpowiedzialności a model racjonalności dyskursywnej: Przyczynek do projektu nowej paidei. In M. Dziemianowicz, D. Gołębniak, & R. Kwaśnica (Eds.). Przetrwanie i rozwój jako niezbywalne powinności wychowania. Wrocław Wydawnictwo Naukowe DSWE TWP.
- Sierocka, B. (2021). Communicating aggression in a megamedia world. Routledge.
- Shepherd, T., Harvey, A., Jordan, T., Srauy, S., and Miltner, K. (2015). Histories of Hating. Social Media + Society, 7–12: 1–10.
- Suler, J. (2004). The online disinhibition effect. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 7(3): 321-6.
- Toffler, A. (1980). The third wave. William Morrow.
- Tomasello, M. (1999). The cultural origins of human cognition. Harvard University Press.
References
Apel, K.-O. (1973). Transformation der Philosophie, v. 1-2. Suhrkamp.
Apel, K.-O. (1986). Logosauszeichnung der menschlichen Sprache. Die philosophische Tragweite der Sprachtheorie. In H.-G. Bosshard (Ed.), Perspektiven auf Sprache. Interdisziplinäre Beiträge zum Gedenken an Hans Hörmann (pp. 45-87). De Gruyter.
Apel, K.-O. (1996). Die Vernunftfunktion der kommunikativen Rationalität. Zum Verhältnis von konsensualkommunikativer Rationalität, strategischer Rationalität und Systemrationalität.
In K.-O. Apel & M. Kettner (Eds.), Die eine Vernunft und die vielen Rationalitäten (pp.17-41) Suhrkamp.
Apel, K.-O., & Holger, B. (Eds.) (2001). Prinzip Mitverantwortung. Grundlage für Ethik und Pädagogik. Königshausen & Neumann.
Bernstein, M. S., Monroy-Hernández, A., Drew, H., André, P., Panovich, K., & Vargas, G. (2011). 4chan and /b/: An analysis of anonymity and ephemerality in a large online community. In Proceedings of the Fifth International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media. AAAI Press. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/221297869_4chan_and_b_An_Analysis_of_Anonymity_and_Ephemerality_in_a_Large_Online_Community
Castells, M. (2001). The internet galaxy: Reflections on the internet, business, and society. Oxford University Press.
Christopherson, K. (2007). The positive and negative implications of anonymity in Internet social interactions: “On the internet, nobody knows you’re a dog.”. Computers in Human Behavior, 23: 3038–3056. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/222428988_The_positive_and_negative_implications_of_anonymity_in_Internet_social_interactions_On_the_Internet_Nobody_Knows_You%27re_a_Dog
Heirman, W., & Walrave, M. (2008). Assessing concerns and issues about the mediation of technology in cyberbullying. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, 2(2).
Jaeger, W. (1986). Paideia: The ideals of Greek culture, Three Volumes. (G. Highed, Trans.). Oxford University Press.
Joinson, A. (1998). Causes and implications of disinhibited behavior on the Internet. In J. Gackenbach (Ed.), Psychology and the Internet: Intrapersonal, interpersonal, and transpersonal implications (pp. 43–60). Academic Press.
Kuhlmann, W. 1985. Reflexive Letztbegründung. Untersuchungen zur Transzendentalpragmatik, Freiburg/München: Verlag Karl Alber.
Lee, E.-J. (2007). Deindividuation effects on group polarization in computer-mediated communication: the role of group identification, public-self-awareness, and perceived argument quality. Journal of Communication, 57(2): 385–403.
Levinson, P. (2009). New new media. Penguin Academics.
Martens, E., & Schnädelbach, H. (1985). Philosophie: Ein Grundkurs. Rowohlt Verlag.
Marrou, H. I. (1982). A history of education in Antiquity. (G. Lamb, Trans.). University of Wisconsin Press.
Postmes, T. and Spears, R. (1998). Deindividuation and antinormative behavior: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 123: 238–259.
Pyżalski, J. (2012). From cyberbullying to electronic aggression: Typology of the phenomenon. Emotional and Behavioural Difficulties, 17(3–4), 305–317.
Searle, J. (1969). Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge University Press.
Sierocka, B. (2003). Krytyka i dyskurs: O transcendentalno-pragmatycznym uprawomocnieniu krytyki filozoficznej. Aureus.
Sierocka, B. (2006). Idea współodpowiedzialności a model racjonalności dyskursywnej: Przyczynek do projektu nowej paidei. In M. Dziemianowicz, D. Gołębniak, & R. Kwaśnica (Eds.). Przetrwanie i rozwój jako niezbywalne powinności wychowania. Wrocław Wydawnictwo Naukowe DSWE TWP.
Sierocka, B. (2021). Communicating aggression in a megamedia world. Routledge.
Shepherd, T., Harvey, A., Jordan, T., Srauy, S., and Miltner, K. (2015). Histories of Hating. Social Media + Society, 7–12: 1–10.
Suler, J. (2004). The online disinhibition effect. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 7(3): 321-6.
Toffler, A. (1980). The third wave. William Morrow.
Tomasello, M. (1999). The cultural origins of human cognition. Harvard University Press.