Main Article Content

Abstract

The aim of this article is to show the dualism of studying in the frames of an institution situated in neoliberal culture influenced by commercialized ways of thinking, which demands staying in the opposition with the idea of schole. This text is an autoethnographical reflection of a pedagogy student, who sets herself in noninstrumental ways of thinking about education presented amongst others by Gert Biesta, Jan Masschelein, Tyson Lewis and Piotr Zamojski. This article is also an attempt to get back voice which was lost under the regime of directives, norms and guidelines in the era of academic capitalism. Besides, it is also an attempt to take the responsibility of studying into one?s own hands and to experience educational freedom.

Keywords

polityka neoliberalna komercjalizacja, autoetnografia wolność edukacyjna studiowanie neoliberal policy commercialization autoetnography educational freedom study

Article Details

How to Cite
Piechowska, M. (2019). The Experience of Emancipation in the Process of Writing M.A. Thesis. INSTED: Interdisciplinary Studies in Education & Society, 22(3(87), 87–100. https://doi.org/10.34862/tce.2019.3.5

References

  1. BIESTA G.J.J., 2013, Time Out, [w:] T. Szkudlarek (red.), Education and the Political, SensePublishers, Rotterdam.
  2. BIESTA G.J.J., SAFSTROM C.A., 2011, A manifesto for education, Policy Futures in Education, 9 (5), DOI: 10.2304/pfie.2011.9.5.540.
  3. BOURDIEU P., PASSERON J.C., 2006, Reprodukcja, PWN, Warszawa.
  4. CHUTORAŃSKI M., SZWABOWSKI O., 2016, O potrzebie pedagogiki radykalnej solidarności – zaproszenie do dyskusji, Teraźniejszość – Człowiek – Edukacja, 1 (73).
  5. CZEREPANIAK-WALCZAK M., 2006, Pedagogika emancypacyjna, Gdańskie Wydawnictwo Psychologiczne, Gdańsk.
  6. DENZIN N.K., 2009, Dyskursy emancypacyjne. Etyka i polityka interpretacji, [w:] N.K. Denzin, Y.S. Lincoln (red.), Metody badań jakościowych, t. II, PWN, Warszawa.
  7. GIROUX H., 1983, Theories of Reproduction and Resistance in the New Sociology of Education: A Critical Analysis, Harvard Educational Review, September 1983, Vol. 53, No. 3.
  8. GIROUX H., 2001, Theory and resistance in Education: Towards a Pedagogy for the Opposition, J F Bergin & Garvey, Westport.
  9. GIROUX H., (2013), Hope in a Time of Permanent War, [online:] https://www.academia.edu/13367809/Hope_in_a_time_of_Despair, [dostęp: 15.06.2019].
  10. ILLICH I., 2010, Odszkolnić społeczeństwo, Fund. bęc zmiana, Warszawa.
  11. KAFAR M., 2016, Auto/biograficzne aspekty praktyk poznawczych, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego, Łódź.
  12. LEWIS T.E., 2013, On Study: Giorgio Agamben and educational potentiality, Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group, London–New York.
  13. LEWIS T.E., 2014, Education as Free Use: Giorgio Agamben on Studious Play, Toys, and the Inoperative Schoolhouse, Stud. Philos. Educ., 33, DOI: 10.1007/s11217-013-9365-4.
  14. MASSCHELEIN J., SIMONS M., 2013, In defence of the school, A Public Issue, E-ducation Culture & Society Publishers, Leuven.
  15. MELVILLE H., 2002, Malville’s Short Novels, Ed. Dan McCall, W.W. Norton and Company, New York.
  16. SZWABOWSKI O., 2019, Nekrofilna produkcja akademicka i pieśni partyzantów, Instytut Pedagogiki Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego, Wrocław.
  17. TERCZ J., 2015, Filozofia i to, co na zewnątrz. Wokół Manifestów dla filozofii Alaina Badiou Machina myśli, dostęp: https://machinamysli.wordpress.com/2015/07/04/filozofia-i-to-co-na-zewnatrz-wokolmanifestow-dla-filozofii-alaina-badiou/.
  18. THOREAU H.D., 2018, Walden, czyli życie w lesie, Dom Wydawniczy REBIS, Poznań.