Main Article Content

Abstract

In this paper I discuss three different ways in which we can refer to those we teach: as a learner, as a student or as a speaker. My interest is not in any aspect of teaching but in the question whether there can be such a thing as emancipatory education. Working with ideas from Jacques Ranci?re I offer the suggestion that emancipatory education can be characterised as education which starts from the assumption that all students can speak. It starts from the assumption, in other words, that students neither lack a capacity for speech, nor that they are producing noise. The idea of the student as a speaker is not offered as an empirical fact but as a different starting point for emancipatory education, one that positions equality at the beginning of education and not at its end.

Keywords

uczący się uczeń nauczyciel mówiący student learner teacher speaker

Article Details

How to Cite
Biesta, G. (2020). Student, Learner, Speaker ? Why It Matters How We Call Those We Teach. INSTED: Interdisciplinary Studies in Education & Society, 16(3(63), 7–22. Retrieved from https://insted-tce.pl/ojs/index.php/tce/article/view/51

References

  1. BIESTA G.J.J., 2004, Against Learning. Reclaiming a language for education in an age of learning, Nordisk Pedagogik, 23.
  2. BIESTA G.J.J., 2006, Beyond Learning: Democratic education for a human future, Boulder, CO, Paradigm.
  3. BIESTA G.J.J., 2007a, Who is Afraid of Education?, University of Tokyo Center for Philosophy Bulletin, 10.
  4. BIESTA G.J.J., 2007b, “Don’t Count Me In”. Democracy, education and the question of inclusion, Nordisk Pedagogik, 27, 1.
  5. BIESTA G.J.J., 2009a, Good Education in an Age of Measurement, Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21, 1.
  6. BIESTA G.J.J., 2009b, Sporadic Democracy. Education, democracy and the question of inclusion, [in:] M. Katz, S. Verducci, G.J.J. Biesta (eds.), Education, Democracy and the Moral Life, Springer, Dordrecht.
  7. BIESTA G.J.J., 2010, Learner, Student, Speaker: Why it matters how we call those we teach, Educational Philosophy and Theory, Special Issue: Rancière, Public Education and the Taming of Democracy, Vol. 42, No. 5–6.
  8. BIESTA G.J.J., 2010a, A New “Logic” of Emancipation. The methodology of Jacques Rancière, Educational Theory, 60, 1.
  9. BIESTA G.J.J., 2010b, Good Education in an Age of Measurement. Ethics, politics, democracy, Boulder, CO, Paradigm.
  10. BINGHAM C., 2010, Settling no Conflict in the Public Place: Truth in education, and in Rancièrean scholarship, Educational Philosophy and Theory, Special Issue: Rancière, Public Education and the Taming of Democracy, Vol. 42, No. 5–6.
  11. DERYCKE M., 2010, Ignorance and Translation, “Artifacts” for Practices of Equality, Educational Philosophy and Theory, Special Issue: Rancière, Public Education and the Taming of Democracy Vol. 42, Nos. 5-6,
  12. GUNN J.S., 1965, The Terminology of the Shearing Industry. Part 1 (A–L), University of Sydney, Australian Language Research Centre, Sydney.
  13. HALLWARD P., 2005, Jacques Rancière and the Subversion of Mastery, Paragraph, 28, 1.
  14. HAUGSBAKK G., NORDKVELLE Y., 2007, The Rhetoric of ICT and the New Language of Learning. A critical analysis of the use of ICT in the curricular field, European Educational Research Journal, 6, 1.
  15. HONNETH A., 1996, The Struggle for Recognition. The moral grammar of social conflicts, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
  16. RANCIÈRE J., 1991, The Ignorant Schoolmaster. Five Lessons in intellectual emancipation, Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA.
  17. RANCIÈRE J., 1995, On the Shores of Politics, Verso, London, New York.
  18. RANCIÈRE J., 1999, Dis-agreement. Politics and philosophy, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, MN.
  19. RANCIÈRE J., 2003, The Philosopher and his Poor, Duke University Press, Durham, NC.
  20. RANCIÈRE J., 2004, The Politics of Aesthetics, Continuum, London.
  21. RANCIÈRE J., (in press), On Ignorant Schoolmasters, [in:] C. Bingham, G.J.J. Biesta, with Jacques Rancière, Jacques Rancière: Education, truth, emancipation, Continuum, London, New York.
  22. RANCIERE J., 2007, Dzielenie postrzegalnego. Estetyka i polityka, przekład M. Kropiwnicki, J. Sowa, Wydawnictwo Ha!Art, Kraków.
  23. RANCIERE J., 2007a, Estetyka jako polityka, [w:] Estetyka jako polityka, przekład J. Kutyła, P. Mościcki, Wydawnictwo Krytyki Politycznej, Warszawa.
  24. RANCIERE J., 2008, Wspólnota jako niezgoda, Jacques Ranciere w rozmowie z François Noudelmannem, Krytyka Polityczna, 04.12.2008.
  25. RUITENBERG C.W., 2008, What if Democracy Really Matters?, Journal of Educational Controversy, 3, 1, Retrieved on 27 October 2009 from http://www.wce.wwu.edu/Resources/CEP/eJournal/v003n001/a005.shtml
  26. RUITENBERG C.W., 2010, Queer Politics in Schools: A Rancièrean reading, Educational Philosophy and Theory, Special Issue: Ranciere, Public Education and the Taming of Democracy, Vol. 42, No. 5–6.
  27. SIMONS M., MASSCHELEIN J., 2010, Hatred of Democracy ... and of the Public Role of Education? Introduction to the Special Issue on Jacques Rancière, Educational Philosophy and Theory, Special Issue: Rancière, Public Education and the Taming of Democracy, Vol. 42, No. 5–6.
  28. SULTANA F., LOFTUS A., 2012, Prawo do wody. W perspektywie politycznej, gospodarczej i społecznej, PAH, Warszawa.