Article Sidebar

Submitted
June 13, 2020
Published
March 31, 2018
Download
pdf (Język Polski)
Statistic
Read Counter : 57 Download : 122

Main Article Content

Abstract

The main aim of this research is a diagnosis of attitudes towards religion, religious institutions (theirrole in public sphere of social functioning), ethics motivated religiously and systems of values. The sam-ple consists of 368 students. It has been assumed that attitudes depend on a system of values and a variation on ?conservatism and openness to change? dimension. The theoretical framework is based on theconcept of S.H. Schwartz and his Portrait Values Questionnaire (PVQ) has been used. In order to meas-ure attitudes a dedicated tool has been constructed. The obtained results give grounds to confirm thehypothesis. Positive attitudes towards the discussed matter are linked to the higher acceptance of the?conservative? value, especially of the following types:: ?humility?, ?tradition?, and ?conformity rules?.Negative attitudes are linked to the higher acceptance of the ?openness to change? value, especially of thefollowing types: ?self-direction-thought?, ?self-direction-action? and ?stimulation?. The difference be-tween these value types are not statistically significant for every analysed attitude.

Keywords

postawy wobec religii instytucji religijnych i motywowanej religijnie etyki system wartości konserwatyzm – otwartość na doświadczenie attitude to religion religious institutions and ethics motivated religiously value system “conservatism – openness to change”

Article Details

License

TCE (INSTED) is an open access journal, which means that access to the full texts is free of charge. People using the journal may download publications, copy and print them, as well as post on their websites links to the full texts of the journal's publications. Texts can be used as long as readers do not exceed the licenses. Authors submitting manuscripts for publication obtain copyrights. Unless otherwise specified, published texts are available under the Creative Commons Attribution - Share Alike 4.0 International license.

How to Cite
Czerniawska, M. (2018). Attitudes towards Religion, Religious Institutions and Ethics Motivated Religiously. INSTED: Interdisciplinary Studies in Education & Society, 21(1(81), 81–102. Retrieved from https://insted-tce.pl/ojs/index.php/tce/article/view/337
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. ATIEH J.M., BRIEF A.P., VOLLRATH D.A., 1987, The Protestant work ethic-conservatism paradox: beliefsand values in work and life, Personality and Individual Differences, Vol. 8.
  2. BERNARDO A.,CLEMENTE J., NALIPAY M., 2016, What personal value types are associated with beliefson the social value of religion? Psychological Studies, Vol. 61.
  3. CIECIUCH J., 2013, Pomiar wartości w zmodyfikowanym modelu Shaloma Schwartza, Psychologia Społeczna, t. 8.
  4. CIECIUCH J., ZALESKI Z., 2011, Polska adaptacja Portretowego Kwestionariusza Wartości Shaloma Schwartza, Czasopismo Psychologiczne, vol. 17.
  5. CZERNIAWSKA M., 1995, Inteligencja a system wartości. Studium psychologiczne, Trans Humana,Białystok.
  6. CZERNIAWSKA M., 2001, Wyznanie religijne a system wartości. Analiza porównawcza systemów wartości dziewięciu wyznań religijnych, [w:] K. Krzysztofek, A. Sadowski (red.), Pogranicza etniczne w Europie.Harmonia i konflikty,Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu w Białymstoku, Białystok.
  7. CZERNIAWSKA M., 2003, Kościoły historyczne a nowe ruchy religijne – analiza porównawcza systemów wartości, Psychologia Rozwojowa, vol. 8.
  8. CZERNIAWSKA M., 2010a, Zmiany wartości i postaw młodzieży w okresie przeobrażeń ustrojowych– kolektywizm versus indywidualizm. Studium interdyscyplinarne,Wydawnictwo Politechniki Białostockiej, Białystok.
  9. CZERNIAWSKA M., 2010b, Co i dlaczego cenimy? – czynniki warunkujące preferencje wartości, Kwartalnik Pedagogiczny, nr 3.
  10. CZERNIAWSKA M., 2010c, Teorie wartości Miltona Rokeacha i Shaloma H. Schwartza, Kwartalnik Pedagogiczny, nr 4.CZERNIAWSKA M., 2012, Postawy wobec religii i instytucji religijnych i ich aksjologiczne uwarunkowania, Studia Edukacyjne, nr 20.
  11. CZERNIAWSKA M., w druku, Stosunek do religii i instytucji religijnych – analiza uwarunkowań aksjologicznych, Przegląd Religioznawczy.
  12. DEVOS T., SPINI D., SCHWARTZ S.H., 2002, Conflicts among human values and trust in institutions, BritishJournal of Social Psychology, Vol. 41.
  13. DOLLINGER S.J., 2001, Religious identity: An autophotographic study, The International Journal for thePsychology of Religion, Vol. 11.
  14. DURKHEIM E., 2010, Elementarne formy życia religijnego: system totemiczny w Australii, Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe, Warszawa.
  15. FEATHER N.T., 1979, Value correlates of conservatism, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,Vol. 37.
  16. FEATHER N.T., 1984, Protestant ethic, conservatism, and values, Journal of Personality and SocialPsychology,t. 46.
  17. FEATHER N.T. 2005. Values, religion, and motivation, [in:] M.L. Maehr, S.A. Karabenick (eds.), Advances inmotivation and achievement: Motivation and religion, Vol. 14, Elsevier, Amsterdam.
  18. FONTAINE J.R.J., DURIEZ B., LUYTEN P., CORVELEYN J., HUTSEBAUT D., 2005. Consequences of a multi-dimensional approach to religion for the relationship between religiosity and value priorities, Inter-national Journal for the Psychology of Religion, Vol. 15.
  19. FONTAINE J.R.J., LUYTEN P., CORVELEYN J., 2000, Tell me what you believe and I’ll tell you what youwant: Empirical evidence for discriminating value patterns of five types of religiosity, The Interna-tional Journal for the Psychology of Religion, Vol. 10.
  20. GENNERICH C., HUBER S., 2006, Value priorities and content of religiosity – New research perspec-tives, Archive for the Psychology of Religion, vol. 28.LAU S., 1989, Religious schema and values, International Journal of Psychology, Vol. 24.
  21. MARKUS H.R., KITAYAMA S., 1998, The cultural psychology of personality, Journal of Cross-CulturalPsychology,Vol. 29.
  22. PALOUTZIAN R.F., 1981, Purpose in life and value changes following conversion, Journal of Personalityand Social Psychology, Vol. 41.
  23. PEPPER M., JACKSON T., UZZELL D., 2010, A study of multidimensional religion constructs and values inthe United Kingdom, Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, Vol. 49.
  24. REYKOWSKI J. (red.), 1993, Wartości i postawy Polaków a zmiany systemowe. Szkice z psychologii politycznej, Wydawnictwo Instytutu Psychologii PAN, Warszawa.
  25. ROCCAS S., 2005, Religion and value systems, Journal of Social Issues, Vol.61.
  26. ROCCAS S., SAGIV L., SCHWARTZ S.H., KNAFO A., 2002, The Big Five personality factors and personalvalues, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 28.
  27. ROCCAS S., SCHWARTZ S.H., 1997, Church-state relations and the association of religiosity with values:A study of Catholics in six countries, Cross-Cultural Research, Vol. 31.
  28. ROKEACH M., 1969a, Value systems and religion,Review of Religious Research, Vol. 11.
  29. ROKEACH M., 1969b, Religious values and social compassion, Review of Religious Research,Vol. 11.
  30. ROKEACH M., 1973, The nature of human values,Free Press, New York.
  31. SAROGLOU V., DELPIERRE V., DERNELLE R., 2004, Values and religiosity: A meta-analysis of studiesusing Schwartz’s model, Personality and Individual Differences, Vol. 37.
  32. SAROGLOU V., DUPUIS J., 2006, Being Buddhist in Western Europe: Cognitive needs, prosocial character,and values, The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, Vol. 16.
  33. SAROGLOU V., MUÑOZ-GARCÍA A., 2008, Individual differences in religion and spirituality: An issue ofpersonality traits and/or values, Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, Vol. 47.
  34. SCHWARTZ S.H., 1990, Individualism-collectivism. Critique and proposed refinements, Journal of Cross--Cultural Psychology,Vol. 21.
  35. SCHWARTZ S.H., 1992, Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances andempirical tests in 20 countries, [in:] M.P. Zanna (ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology,Vol. 25, Academic Press, Orlando, FL.
  36. SCHWARTZ S.H., 1996, Value priorities and behavior: Applying a theory of integrated value systems, [in:]C. Seligman, J.M. Olson, M.P. Zanna (eds.), The psychology of values: The Ontario Symposium, Vol. 8,Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Mahwah, New Jersey.
  37. SCHWARTZ S.H., 2007, Value orientations: Measurement, antecedents and consequences across nations,[in:] R. Jowell, C. Roberts, R. Fitzgerald, G. Eva (eds.), Measuring attitudes cross-nationally – les-sons from the European Social Survey, Sage Publications, London.
  38. SCHWARTZ S.H., BILSKY W., 1987, Toward a psychological structure of human values, Journal of Per-sonality and Social Psychology, Vol. 53.
  39. SCHWARTZ S.H., BILSKY W., 1990, Toward a theory of the universal content and structure of values:Extensions and cross-cultural replications, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,Vol. 58.
  40. SCHWARTZ S.H., HUISMANS S., 1995, Value priorities and religiosity in four Western religions,SocialPsychology Quarterly, Vol. 58.
  41. SOHLBERG S.C., 1986, Similarity and dissimilarity in value patterns of Israeli kibbutz and city adoles-cents, International Journal of Psychology, Vol. 21.
  42. SPILKA B., HOOD R.W. JR., HUNSBERGER B., GORSUCH R., 2003, The psychology of religion: An empiricalapproach, Guilford Press, New York.
  43. WOLFE G., MOURRIBI A., 1985, Acomparison of the value systems of Lebanese Christian and Muslimmen and women, Journal of Social Psychology, Vol. 125.
  44. WYSOCKA E., 2000, Młodzież a religia. Społeczny wymiar religijności młodzieży,Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego, Katowice.