Main Article Content
Abstract
The article presents ontological and axiological criteria of organising help for the disabled. The basis for the examination is the concept of Ju?rgen Habermas? communication activity. What results from the research I have conducted is that while organising the help it is essential to establish the extent of rationality and self-awareness of the disabled in need. It allows to specify the axiological hierarchy of existences, needs, aspirations, targets, etc. adopted by them. Therefore the disabled people should be provided with a chance of a free and fair discourse with particular members of society. However, first, it is necessary to prepare them appropriately for the participation in the discourse, both meritorically and normatively.
Keywords
Article Details
TCE (INSTED) is an open access journal, which means that access to the full texts is free of charge. People using the journal may download publications, copy and print them, as well as post on their websites links to the full texts of the journal's publications. Texts can be used as long as readers do not exceed the licenses. Authors submitting manuscripts for publication obtain copyrights. Unless otherwise specified, published texts are available under the Creative Commons Attribution - Share Alike 4.0 International license.
References
- BAXTER H., 2011, Habermas: The Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy, Stanford University Press, California.
- EDGAR A., 2006, Habermas: the key concepts, Taylor & Francis, New York.
- FINLAYSON J.G., 2005, Habermas: a very short introduction, Oxford University Press, Cornwall.
- GANIS R., 2011, The politics of care in Habermas and Derrida, Lexington Books, Lanham.
- HABERMAS J., 1999, Teoria działania komunikacyjnego, t. 1: Racjonalność działania a racjonalność społeczna, Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, Warszawa.
- HABERMAS J., 2002, Teoria działania komunikacyjnego, t. 2: Przyczynek do krytyki rozumu funkcjonalnego, Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, Warszawa.
- HABERMAS J., 2003, Przyszłość natury ludzkiej. Czy zmierzamy do eugeniki liberalnej?, Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar, Warszawa.
- HABERMAS J., 2007, Filozoficzny dyskurs nowoczesności, Universitas, Kraków.
- INGRAM D., 2004, Rights, democracy, and fulfillment in the era of identity politics: principled compromises in a compromised world, Rowman and Littefield, Inc., Lanham.
- KLOSS D., 2010, Occupational health law, John Wiley and Sons, Ames.
- LUNDÄLV J., LINDQVIST R., 2009, Between “Lifeworld” and “System”: Caseworker Role Conflict in the Provision of Disability Services to People Injured by Traffic Accidents in Sweden, Australian Journal of Rehabilitation Counselling, Vol. 15, Iss. 2.
- MORRIS M., 2009, Social Justice and Communication: Mill, Marx, and Habermas, Social Justice Research, 22.
- PEARCE C., PHILLIPS C., HALL S., 2009, Contributions from the lifeworld: quality, caring and the general practice nurse, Quality in Primary Care, 17.
- PEZDEK K., 2010, The responsibility as the value in the work of the physiotherapist, Fizjoterapia, 18, 1.
- PEZDEK K., 2011, The body as a value in the axiology of disabled persons, Human Movement, Vol. 12 (3).
- SMART J.F., SMART D.W., Models of disability. Implications for the counseling profession, [in:] A.E. Dell Orto, P.W. Power (eds.), 2007, The psychological and social impact of illness and disability, Springer Publishing Company, New York.
- SNEDEKER G., 2000, Defending the Enlightenment: Jürgen Habermas and the Theory of Communicative Reason, Dialectical Anthropology, 25.
- WRIGHT Ch., 2004, Particularity and Perspective Taking: On Feminism and Habermas’s Discourse Theory of Morality, Hypatia, Vol. 19, No. 4.
References
BAXTER H., 2011, Habermas: The Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy, Stanford University Press, California.
EDGAR A., 2006, Habermas: the key concepts, Taylor & Francis, New York.
FINLAYSON J.G., 2005, Habermas: a very short introduction, Oxford University Press, Cornwall.
GANIS R., 2011, The politics of care in Habermas and Derrida, Lexington Books, Lanham.
HABERMAS J., 1999, Teoria działania komunikacyjnego, t. 1: Racjonalność działania a racjonalność społeczna, Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, Warszawa.
HABERMAS J., 2002, Teoria działania komunikacyjnego, t. 2: Przyczynek do krytyki rozumu funkcjonalnego, Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, Warszawa.
HABERMAS J., 2003, Przyszłość natury ludzkiej. Czy zmierzamy do eugeniki liberalnej?, Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar, Warszawa.
HABERMAS J., 2007, Filozoficzny dyskurs nowoczesności, Universitas, Kraków.
INGRAM D., 2004, Rights, democracy, and fulfillment in the era of identity politics: principled compromises in a compromised world, Rowman and Littefield, Inc., Lanham.
KLOSS D., 2010, Occupational health law, John Wiley and Sons, Ames.
LUNDÄLV J., LINDQVIST R., 2009, Between “Lifeworld” and “System”: Caseworker Role Conflict in the Provision of Disability Services to People Injured by Traffic Accidents in Sweden, Australian Journal of Rehabilitation Counselling, Vol. 15, Iss. 2.
MORRIS M., 2009, Social Justice and Communication: Mill, Marx, and Habermas, Social Justice Research, 22.
PEARCE C., PHILLIPS C., HALL S., 2009, Contributions from the lifeworld: quality, caring and the general practice nurse, Quality in Primary Care, 17.
PEZDEK K., 2010, The responsibility as the value in the work of the physiotherapist, Fizjoterapia, 18, 1.
PEZDEK K., 2011, The body as a value in the axiology of disabled persons, Human Movement, Vol. 12 (3).
SMART J.F., SMART D.W., Models of disability. Implications for the counseling profession, [in:] A.E. Dell Orto, P.W. Power (eds.), 2007, The psychological and social impact of illness and disability, Springer Publishing Company, New York.
SNEDEKER G., 2000, Defending the Enlightenment: Jürgen Habermas and the Theory of Communicative Reason, Dialectical Anthropology, 25.
WRIGHT Ch., 2004, Particularity and Perspective Taking: On Feminism and Habermas’s Discourse Theory of Morality, Hypatia, Vol. 19, No. 4.