Article Sidebar

Submitted
June 13, 2020
Published
December 31, 2012
Download
PDF (Język Polski)
Statistic
Read Counter : 23 Download : 21

Main Article Content

Abstract

In this paper I will try to look to the past in the present as the possible future of social science. My argument proceeds in the first section to explore a genealogy of social science as planning the future. The planning to design people is visible in the long nineteenth century. This planning to design the child, the family and community joins utopian narratives in the planning associated with the social sciences, linking human agency to effect change with spaces of collective belonging given in the names of democracy, the common good and the nation. The scenario of design in contemporary research is taken up in the second section. The final section turns to a different notion of practice as an alternative practical science, that is, a history of the present. The future of the social sciences as argued is one that takes the present and asks about the conditions that historically make possible what is seen, acted on, talked about and felt. The argument, however, is not against planning but to explore the limits of contemporary orthodoxies.

Keywords

Popkewitz nauki społeczne nauki pedagogiczne Popkewitz social sciences educational sciences

Article Details

License

TCE (INSTED) is an open access journal, which means that access to the full texts is free of charge. People using the journal may download publications, copy and print them, as well as post on their websites links to the full texts of the journal's publications. Texts can be used as long as readers do not exceed the licenses. Authors submitting manuscripts for publication obtain copyrights. Unless otherwise specified, published texts are available under the Creative Commons Attribution - Share Alike 4.0 International license.

How to Cite
Popkewitz, T. S. (2012). The Past as the Future of the Social and Educational Sciences. INSTED: Interdisciplinary Studies in Education & Society, 15(4(60), 7–27. Retrieved from https://insted-tce.pl/ojs/index.php/tce/article/view/280
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. BLEDSTEIN B., 1976, The culture of professionalism, the middle class, and the development of higher education in America, Norton & Co., New York.
  2. CASSIRER E., 2010, Filozofia oświecenia, tłum. T. Zatorski, Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego, Warszawa (tekst opublikowany pierwotnie w 1932 roku).
  3. CHAMBERLIN J.E., GILMAN S.L. (eds.), 1985, Degeneration: The dark side of progress, Columbia University Press, New York.
  4. CRARY J., 2008, On the ends of sleep: Shadows in the glare of a 24/7 world. Quaderns portàtils, MACBA, Barcelona, Spain.
  5. DANZIGER K., 1997, Naming the mind: How psychology found its language, Sage, London.
  6. DAY C., SAMMONS P., GU Q., 2008, Combining qualitative and quantitative methodologies in research on teachers’ lives, work, and effectiveness: From integration to synergy, Educational Researcher, 37(6).
  7. DILLON S., 2010, Method to grade teachers provokes battles, New York Times, 31.08.
  8. EKSTEINS M., 1985, Anthropology and degeneration, [in:] J.E. Chamberlin, S. L. Gilman (eds.), Degeneration: The dark side of progress, Columbia University Press, New York.
  9. European Commission C, 2011, Draft. Work Programme 2012. Cooperation. Theme 8: Socio-Economic Sciences And Humanities. Annex 12 To The Decision, Bruksela.
  10. FERGUSON R.A., 1997, The American enlightenment, 1750–1820, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
  11. FOUCAULT M., 2010, The government of self and others. Lectures at the Collège de France 1982–1983, F. Gros (ed.), G. Burchell (Trans.), Palgrave, New York (tekst opublikowany pierwotnie w roku 2008).
  12. FRANKLIN B., 1987, Learning disability: Dissenting essays, Taylor & Francis, New York.
  13. FREDRICKSON G., 2002, Racism: A short history, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
  14. GOULDNER A.W., 2010, Kryzys zachodniej socjologii, tłum. P. Tomanek, Nomos, Kraków.
  15. GROSZ E., 2004, The nick of time: Politics, evolution, and the untimely, Duke University Press, Durham, NC.
  16. HACKING I., 1986, Making up people, [in:] T.C. Heller, M. Sosna, D.E. Wellbery (eds.), Reconstructing individualism: Autonomy, individuality, and the self in Western thought, Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA.
  17. HARRIS D., 2010, Commentary: The evidence on race to the top, Education Week, 29(27).
  18. HIRST P., 1994, The evolution of consciousness: Identity and personality in historical perspective, Economy and Society, 23(1).
  19. ISAAC, 2009, Tangled loops: Theory, history, and the human sciences in modern America, Modern Intellectual History, 6(2).
  20. JUROW A.S., 2004, Generalizing in interaction: Middle school mathematics students ma king mathematical generalizations in a population-modeling project, Mind, Culture, and Activity, 11(4).
  21. KANT I., 1996, Odpowiedź na pytanie: Czym jest Oświecenie?, [w:] I. Kant, Rozprawy z filozofii historii, tłum. T. Kupś, M. Żelazny i in., Wydawnictwo Antyk, Kęty (tekst pierwotnie opublikowany w 1784 roku).
  22. KOSELLECK R, 1985, Futures past: On the semantics of historical time, K. Tribe (trans.), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA (tekst opublikowany pierwotnie w 1979 roku).
  23. KOSELLECK R, 2004, “Space of experience” and “Horizon of expectation”: Two historical categories. [in:] R. Kosseleck, Futures past: On the semantics of historical time, K. Tribe (trans.), Columbia University Press, New York (tekst opublikowany pierwotnie w 1979 roku).
  24. KRUG E., 1972, The shaping of the American high school: Vol. 2. 1920–1941, University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, WI.
  25. KRUGMAN P., 6.09.2009, September 6, How did economists get it so wrong?, New York Times (http://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/06/magazine/06Economic-t.html?ref=paulkrugman, data pobrania: 17.09.2012); polski przekład: Jak ekonomiści mogli się aż tak bardzo pomylić?, (http://www.obserwatorfinansowy.pl/forma/komentarze-swiat/for-the-magazine-marking/, data pobrania: 17.09.2012).
  26. LEVINE D., 1995, Visions of the sociological tradition, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
  27. MCKNIGHT D., 2003, Schooling, the Puritan imperative, and the molding of an American national identity. Education’s “errand into the wilderness”, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ.
  28. MOLL L., 2010, Mobilizing culture, language, and educational practices: Fulfilling the promises of Mendez and Brown, Educational Researcher, 39(6).
  29. National Research Council, 2002, Scientific research in education, Center for Education, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, Committee on Scientific Principles for Education Research, National Research Council Washington, DC.
  30. NOVEMBER V, COMACHO-HÜBNER E., LATOUR B., 2010, Entering a risky territory: Space in the age of digital navigation, Environment and Planning D, 28(4).
  31. POCOCK J.G.A., 2003, Machiavellian moment: Florentine political thought and the Atlantic Republican tradition (with a new Afterword), Princeton University Press, Princeton.
  32. POPKEWITZ T., 2008, Cosmopolitanism and the age of school reform: Science, education, and making society by making the child, Routledge, New York.
  33. RANCIÈRE J., 2008, Nienawiść do demokracji, tłum. M. Kropiwnicki, Instytut Wydawniczy Książka i Prasa, Warszawa.
  34. REUBEN J., 1996, The making of the modern university: Intellectual transformations and the marginalization of morality, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
  35. SCHLERETH T.J., 1977, The cosmopolitan idea in Enlightenment thought, its form and function in the ideas of Franklin, Hume, and Voltaire, 1694–1790, University of Notre Dame Press, South Bend.
  36. SKLANSKY J., 2002, The soul’s economy: Market society and selfhood in American thought, 1820–1920, University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill.
  37. STEEDMAN C., 1995, Strange dislocations: Childhood and the idea of human interiority, 1780–1930, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
  38. THORNDIKE E.L., 1962, Education: A first book, [in:] G.M. Joncich (ed.), Psychology and the science of education: Selected writings of Edward L. Thorndike, Bureau of Publications, Teachers College, Columbia University New York (tekst pierwotnie opublikowany w 1912 roku).
  39. TODOROV T., 1996, Podbój Ameryki. Problem innego, tłum. J. Wojcieszak, Fundacja Aletheia, Warszawa.
  40. TOULMIN S., 2005, Kosmopolis. Ukryty projekt nowoczesności, tłum. T. Zarębski, Wydawnictwo Naukowe Dolnośląskiej Szkoły Wyższej Edukacji TWP, Wrocław.
  41. TRÖHLER D., 2011, Languages of education: Protestant legacies, national identities, and global aspirations, Routledge, New York.
  42. TUNSTALL P., 2003, Definitions of the ‘subject’: The relations between the discourses of educational assessment and the psychology of motivation and their constructions of personal reality, British Educational Research Journal, 29(4).
  43. WAGNER P., 2005, I, Thesis Eleven, 80.
  44. WARD F.L., 1883, Dynamic sociology, or applied social science, as based upon statistical sociology and the less complex sciences, D. Appleton and Co., New York.