Article Sidebar

Submitted
June 9, 2020
Published
September 30, 2015
Download
PDF (Język Polski)
Statistic
Read Counter : 194 Download : 125

Main Article Content

Abstract

Feedback received by students plays an important role in shaping students? academic progress, their ability to abide by certain rules and norms as well as their pro-social behaviours. The effectiveness of feedback depends on the way it is provided. The aim of this study was to determine what type of feedback is the most prevalent in the student-teacher communication. Provided feedback was analysed from two separate perspectives: students? and teachers?. Students (N = 271) and teachers (N = 65) from chosen high schools took part in the study. Teacher?s Feedbacks Questionnaire was used to obtain the respondents? opinions on the frequency of different types of feedback provided both in ?teaching situations? vs ?pedagogical situations? and with respect to positive vs negative behaviours. Thanks to the application of an appropriate procedure it was possible to obtain data regarding: 1) teachers? imagined expectations of students and 2) actual reactions (as declared individually). Students were tested in regards to: 3) their expectations towards feedback and 4/ actual feedback received from the teachers.


The results show that, as for the positive feedback, teachers? beliefs towards what is expected by the students and what students actually expect were congruent, whereas it was opposite regarding the negative feedback. A clear discrepancy could also be seen between students? and teachers? opinions concerning the actual feedback provided for both positive and negative feedback. There is a clear tendency for teachers to present themselves as communicatively competent pedagogues, who provide effective and constructive feedback. Students, on the other hand, indicate that the student-teacher communication is lacking in terms of providing feedback

Keywords

komunikacja nauczyciel–uczeń informacja zwrotna teacher-student communication feedback

Article Details

License

TCE (INSTED) is an open access journal, which means that access to the full texts is free of charge. People using the journal may download publications, copy and print them, as well as post on their websites links to the full texts of the journal's publications. Texts can be used as long as readers do not exceed the licenses. Authors submitting manuscripts for publication obtain copyrights. Unless otherwise specified, published texts are available under the Creative Commons Attribution - Share Alike 4.0 International license.

How to Cite
Bąk, O. (2015). Feedbacks at School from Teachers? and Students? Perspectives. INSTED: Interdisciplinary Studies in Education & Society, 18(3(71), 85–100. Retrieved from https://insted-tce.pl/ojs/index.php/tce/article/view/184
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. ADLER R.B., ROSENFELD L.B., PROCTOR R.F., 2006, Relacje interpersonalne, tłum. G. Skoczylas, Dom Wydawniczy REBIS, Poznań.
  2. BĄK O., 2011, Informacje zwrotne przekazywane przez nauczycieli w percepcji uczniów szkół ponadgimnazjalnych, Psychologia Rozwojowa, 16, 2.
  3. BEE R., BEE F., 2000, Feedback, tłum. I. Morżoł, Petit, Warszawa.
  4. BENG HUAT S., JAMES A., 2011, The potential role of schools and teachers in the character development of young people in England: Perspectives from pupils and teachers, Evaluation & Research in Education, 24, 2.
  5. BLACK P., HARRISON C., LEE C., MARSHALL B., DYLAN W., 2002, Working inside the black box: Assessment for learning in the classroom, Glassessment, London.
  6. BURNETT P.C., 2001, Elementary students’ preferences for teacher praise, Journal of Classroom Interactions, 36, 1.
  7. CHALK K., BIZO L., 2004, Specific praise improves on-task behaviour and numeracy enjoyment. A study of year four pupils engaged in numeracy hour, Educational Psychology in Practice, 4 (20).
  8. DECI R., KOESTNER R., RYAN R., 1999, A meta-analytic review of experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation, Psychological Bulletin, 125.
  9. HATTIE J., TIMPERLY H., 2007, The Power of Feedback, Review of Educational Research, 1 (77).
  10. JAGIEŁA J., 2004, Komunikacja interpersonalna w szkole. Krótki przewodnik psychologiczny, Rubikon, Kraków.
  11. JUSSIM L., PALUMBO P., CHAPMAN C., MADON S., SMITH A., 2008, Piętno a samospełniające się proroctwa, [w:] T.F. Heatherton, R.E. Kleck, M.R. Hebl, J.G. Hull (red.), Społeczna psychologia piętna, tłum. J. Radzicki, Collegium Civitas i PWN, Warszawa.
  12. KLUGER A.N., DENISI A., 1996, The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory, Psychological Bulletin, 119.
  13. ŁUKASZEWSKI W., 2002, Zwrotne informacje o wyniku czynności, [w:] I. Kurcz, D. Kądzielawa (red.), Psychologia czynności – nowe perspektywy, Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar, Warszawa.
  14. MACIĄG J., 2001, Komunikacja interpersonalna w relacji nauczyciel–uczeń, [w:] W. Kojs (red.), Procesy komunikacyjne w szkole: wyznaczniki, tendencje, problemy, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego, Katowice.
  15. MORY E., 2004, Feedback research revisited, [in:] D. Jonassen (ed.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology, Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah NY.
  16. POULOS A., MAHONY M.J., 2008, Effectiveness of feedback: the students’ perspective, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 2 (33).
  17. SHARP P., 1985, Behaviour modification in the secondary school: A survey of students’, attitudes to rewards and praise, Behavioral Approaches with Children, 9.
  18. SWINSON J., HARROP A., 2001, The differential effects of teacher approval and disapproval in junior and infant classrooms, Educational Psychology in Practice, 2 (17).
  19. SWINSON J., KNIGHT R., 2007, Teacher verbal feedback directed towards secondary pupils with challenging behaviour and its relationship to their behaviour, Educational Psychology in Practice, 3 (23).