Main Article Content

Abstract

This article presents conceptual analysis of  two multilingual MOOCs developed within the ILLS‑PEC project as a design intervention intended to reframe subject‑teacher education for plurilingual, refugee‑receiving classrooms. Anchored in Pluriliteracies Teaching for Deeper Learning (PTDL), multiliteracies and Fiction and Content Unified Learning (FACUL), it examines the course’s design principles, multilingual task architectures and emerging credentialing mechanisms. At the level of provision, the MOOCs are designed to address   a gap in teacher education by reducing linguistic and infrastructural barriers to participation and  offering certification of course completion to diverse groups of educators, including those with refugee backgrounds. Informed by participatory design involving stakeholders in partner countries, including input from refugee‑community representatives, the courses incorporate accessibility and equity considerations from the outset. Pedagogically, they seek to move beyond monolingual, transmission‑oriented models towards design‑oriented teaching practices that position learners’ full linguistic repertoires, affective experiences and multimodal resources  as central to subject  learning. At system level, the project is conceptualised asa mediating layer between policy aspirations and everyday practice, offering a potentially scalable model of equity‑oriented professional learning whose implementation and impact require future empirical evaluation of impact.

Keywords

MOOCs refugee-receiving classrooms inclusive course design teacher education

Article Details

How to Cite
Muszyńska, B., & Ditze, S.-A. (2026). Bridging the Gap with MOOCs Integrating Languages, Literacies and Content in Plurilingual, Refugee-Receiving Classrooms. INSTED: Interdisciplinary Studies in Education & Society, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.34862/tce.2026.2.1

References

  1. Bergroth, M., Llompart, J., Pepiot, N., van der Worp, K., Dražnik, T., & Sierens, S. (2022). Identifying space for mainstreaming multilingual pedagogies in European initial teacher education policies. European Educational Research Journal, 21(5), 801-821. https://doi.org/10.1177/14749041211012500
  2. Byram, M. (2008). From foreign language education to education for intercultural citizenship: Essays and reflections. Multilingual Matters. https://doi.org/10.21832/9781847690807
  3. Calafato, R. (2020). Evaluating teacher multilingualism across contexts and multiple languages: validation and insights. Heliyon, 6(8), e04471. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04471
  4. Cooc, N., & Kim, G. M. (2023). School inclusion of refugee students: Recent trends from international data. Educational Researcher, 52(4), 206-218. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X221149396
  5. Cope, B., & Kalantzis, M. (2015). The things you do to know: An introduction to the pedagogy of multiliteracies. In B. Cope & M. Kalantzis (Eds.), A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Learning by design (pp. 1-36). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137539724_1
  6. Council of Europe. (2022). Recommendation CM/Rec(2022)1 of the Committee of Ministers to member States on the importance of plurilingual and intercultural education for democratic culture. https://search.coe.int/cm?i=0900001680a563ca
  7. Coyle, D., & Meyer, O. (2021). Beyond CLIL: Pluriliteracies teaching for deeper learning. Cambridge University Press.
  8. Coyle, D., Meyer, O., & Staschen‑Dielmann, S. (Eds.). (2023). A deeper learning companion for CLIL: Putting pluriliteracies into practice. Cambridge University Press.
  9. Cummins, J., Hu, S., Markus, P., & Montero, M. K. (2015). Identity texts and academic achievement: Connecting the dots in multilingual school contexts. TESOL Quarterly, 49(3), 555-581. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.241
  10. Cummins, J., Owens, A. J., & García Gurrutxaga, M. L. (2022). Language and inclusion: Transforming the challenge of linguistic diversity into educational opportunities. Grand place: Pensamiento y cultura, 18, 115-134.
  11. Dalton Puffer, C. (2013). A construct of cognitive discourse functions for conceptualising content-language integration in CLIL and multilingual education. European Journal of Applied Linguistics, 1(2), 216-253. https://doi.org/10.1515/eujal-2013-0011
  12. Darling-Hammond, L., Burns, D., Campbell, C., Goodwin, A. L., Hammerness, K., Low, E.-L., McIntyre, A., Sato, M., & Zeichner, K. (2017). Empowered educators: How high-performing systems shape teaching quality around the world. Jossey-Bass.
  13. Dryden-Peterson, S. (2016). Refugee education in countries of first asylum: Breaking open the black box of pre-resettlement experiences. Theory and Research in Education, 14(2), 131-148. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477878515622703
  14. Escamilla, K., Hopewell, S., Butvilofsky, S., Sparrow, W., Soltero-González, L., & Escamilla, M. (2014). Biliteracy from the start: Literacy Squared in action. Caslon.
  15. European Education and Culture Executive Agency, & Eurydice. (2023). Key data on teaching languages at school in Europe – 2023 edition. Publications Office of the European Union. https://eurydice.ba/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/Key-data-on-teaching-languages-at-school-in-Europe.pdf
  16. García, O., & Lin, A. M. Y. (2017). Translanguaging in bilingual education. In García, O. Lin, A. M. Y. & May, S. (Eds.), Bilingual and multilingual education (3rd ed., pp. 117-130). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02258-1_9
  17. García, O., & Wei, L. (2014). Translanguaging: Language, bilingualism and education. Palgrave Macmillan.
  18. Gee, J. P. (1996). Social linguistics and literacies: Ideology in discourses (2nd ed.). Taylor & Francis.
  19. Hollands, F. M., & Tirthali, D. (2014). MOOCs: Expectations and reality. Full report. Columbia University, Teachers College, Center for Benefit-Cost Studies of Education. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED547237.pdf
  20. Hornberger, N. H. (Ed.). (2003). Continua of biliteracy: An ecological framework for educational policy, research, and practice in multilingual settings. Multilingual Matters.
  21. Hornberger, N. H., & Kvietok Dueñas, F. (2019). Mapping biliteracy teaching in Indigenous contexts: From student shyness to student voice. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 50(1), 6-25. https://doi.org/10.1111/aeq.12276
  22. Huertas-Abril, C., & Muszyńska, B. (2022). Learning design preferences in LMOOCs: An international comparative study. International Journal of Computer-Assisted Language Learning and Teaching (IJCALLT), 12(1), 1-17. http://doi.org/10.4018/IJCALLT.291106
  23. Iniesto, F., & Rodrigo, C. (2024). Understanding accessibility in MOOCs: Findings and recommendations for future designs. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 1, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.5334/jime.897
  24. Lambert, S. R. (2020). Do MOOCs contribute to student equity and social inclusion? A systematic review 2014-18. Computers & Education, 145, 103693. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103693
  25. Laurillard, D. (2016). The educational problem that MOOCs could solve: Professional development for teachers of disadvantaged students. Research in Learning Technology, 24, Article 29369. https://doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v24.29369
  26. Muszyńska, B. (2024). Edukacja dwujęzyczna przez projektowanie. Multialfabetyzacja przedmiotowo-językowa [Bilingual education by design: Content and language multiliteracies]. Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
  27. Muszyńska, B., Stewart, M. A. (2026). When language and literacy touch our hearts: Implications for refugee education from a biliteracy stance. Journal of Language, Identity & Education, 25(4), 1172-1189. https://doi.org/10.1080/15348458.2025.2467194
  28. New London Group. (1996). A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures. Harvard Educational Review, 66(1), 60-92. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.66.1.17370n67v22j160u
  29. OECD. (2020). Education at a glance 2020: OECD indicators. OECD Publishing.
  30. Roth, P. (2010). Nemesis. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
  31. Stewart, M. A., & Muszyńska, B. (2025). Supporting a Polish teacher of newcomer students: Innovative and contextual literacy instruction for second language acquisition. Reading Research Quarterly, 60(3), e70011. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.70011
  32. Stewart, M. A., & Muszyńska, B. (2023). Teaching ideas for biliteracy: Leveraging students’ languages and lives. Forum Oświatowe, 36(2), 77-95. https://doi.org/10.34862/fo.2023.2.4
  33. Street, B. (1995). Social literacies: Critical approaches to literacy development, ethnography, and education. Taylor & Francis.
  34. Štremfel, U. (2024). Policies supporting teachers’ social and emotional competencies, and diversity awareness on the European Union level. In U. Štremfel (Ed.), Empowering teachers across Europe to deal with social, emotional and diversity-related challenges. Policy perspectives (pp. 37-53). Waxmann.
  35. Ting, T., Rieder-Marschallinger S., & Dalton-Puffer, C. (Eds.). (2024). Overview of curricular demands of disciplinary literacies: An exploratory survey and report by CLILNetLE Working Group 3 Deliverable 7. https://doi.org/10.25365/phaidra.532_20
  36. UNESCO. (2017, February 17). Mother tongue-based multilingual education: The key to unlocking SDG 4: quality Education for All. UNESCO. https://www.unesco.org/en/articles/mother-tongue-based-multilingual-education-key-unlocking-sdg-4-quality-education-all
  37. UNHCR. (2024). Refugee education: Five years on from the launch of the 2030 refugee education strategy (UNHCR Education Report 2024). United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees. https://www.unhcr.org/media/unhcr-education-report-2024-refugee-education-five-years-launch-2030-refugee-education
  38. Walji, S., Deacon, A., Small, J., & Czerniewicz, L. (2018). Learning through engagement: MOOCs as an emergent form of provision. University of Cape Town, Centre for Innovation in Learning and Teaching.